Home Table of Contents

Rule 3. Council on Judicial Complaints

Oklahoma Statutes AnnotatedTitle 5. Attorneys and State BarEffective: June 19, 2023

Oklahoma Statutes Annotated
Title 5. Attorneys and State Bar
Chapter 1.--Appendix 4-a. Rules Governing Complaints on Judicial Misconduct
Effective: June 19, 2023
T. 5, Ch. 1, App. 4-A, Rule 3
Rule 3. Council on Judicial Complaints
To ensure independent investigation of the complaint, the Council on Judicial Complaints is authorized to receive and investigate complaints regarding a judge as defined in 20 O.S.2021, § 1404 or a judicial candidate as defined in 20 O.S.2021, § 1404.1. Investigation of the complaint shall be in conformity with the procedures set forth in 20 O.S.2021, §§ 1651 et seq.
If, after an investigation, the Council on Judicial Complaints finds evidence of misconduct that does not warrant removal from office, disqualification from holding future judicial office, or compulsory retirement by the Court on the Judiciary, it shall forward all papers concerning the same, together with its findings, to the Chief Justice of the Oklahoma Supreme Court for review and possible discipline. If the Council forwards findings to the Chief Justice, it shall provide written notice to the complainant and to the judge or judicial candidate within 20 days thereof. It is within the Council's discretion whether to share the contents of its findings with the judge or judicial candidate.
It is not contemplated that every violation of a Rule will result in the referral of findings to the Chief Justice. If, after an investigation, the Council on Judicial Complaint finds evidence of misconduct or the appearance of misconduct that does not warrant referral of its findings to the Chief Justice, it may issue a letter of caution to the judge or judicial candidate and advise the complainant that the complaint has been dismissed with a warning or letter of caution to the judge or judicial candidate. The warning or letter of caution shall not constitute an adjudication.
Nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent the Council on Judicial Complaints from forwarding findings to the Chief Justice for review and possible discipline of a judge who retired during the pendency of an investigation, a judge whose term expired during the pendency of an investigation due to an unsuccessful election, or an unsuccessful candidate in a judicial election.

Credits

Adopted effective October 26, 2006. Amended effective June 19, 2023.
Complaints on Judicial Misconduct, Rule 3, 5 O. S. A. Ch. 1, App. 4-A, OK ST COMPLAINTS J MISC Rule 3
Current with amendments received through April 15, 2024. Some rules may be more current, see credits for details.
End of Document