Modify the Terms of the Gas Rate Plan for Purposes of RDM Reconciliations
NY-ADR
9/5/12 N.Y. St. Reg. PSC-18-12-00013-A
NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
VOLUME XXXIV, ISSUE 36
September 05, 2012
RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
NOTICE OF ADOPTION
I.D No. PSC-18-12-00013-A
Filing Date. Aug. 20, 2012
Effective Date. Aug. 20, 2012
Modify the Terms of the Gas Rate Plan for Purposes of RDM Reconciliations
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:
Action taken:
On 8/16/12, the PSC adopted an order approving, in part, the petition of Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation to modify the terms of the Gas Rate Plan, by further consolidating non-residential customer classes for purposes of RDM reconciliations.
Statutory authority:
Public Service Law, section 66(12)
Subject:
Modify the terms of the Gas Rate Plan for purposes of RDM reconciliations.
Purpose:
To approve, in part, a modification to the terms of the Gas Rate Plan for purposes of RDM reconciliations.
Substance of final rule:
The Commission, on August 16, 2012 adopted an order approving, in part, the petition of Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation to modify the terms of the currently-effective Gas Rate Plan, by further consolidating certain non-residential customer classes for purposes of Revenue Decoupling Mechanism (RDM) reconciliations to consolidate non-residential rate group SC-1/SC-5 with non-residential rate group SC-3/SC-3HP, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the order.
Final rule as compared with last published rule:
No changes.
Text of rule may be obtained from:
Leann Ayer, Public Service Commission, 3 Empire State Plaza, Albany, New York 12223, (518) 486-2655, email: [email protected] An IRS employer ID no. or social security no. is required from firms or persons to be billed 25 cents per page. Please use tracking number found on last line of notice in requests.
Assessment of Public Comment
An assessment of public comment is not submitted with this notice because the rule is within the definition contained in section 102(2)(a)(ii) of the State Administrative Procedure Act.
(09-G-0718SA2)
| End of Document |