Anti-Stacking of NSAIDs, Add Diclofenac (HA) and Delete Meclofenamic Acid from 48-Hour NSAIDs
NY-ADR
2/7/18 N.Y. St. Reg. SGC-45-16-00004-A
NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
VOLUME XL, ISSUE 6
February 07, 2018
RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
NEW YORK STATE GAMING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF ADOPTION
I.D No. SGC-45-16-00004-A
Filing No. 104
Filing Date. Jan. 23, 2018
Effective Date. Feb. 07, 2018
Anti-Stacking of NSAIDs, Add Diclofenac (HA) and Delete Meclofenamic Acid from 48-Hour NSAIDs
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:
Action taken:
Amendment of sections 4020.1(e) and 4043.2(e) of Title 9 NYCRR.
Statutory authority:
Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law, sections 103(2), 104(1), (19), 301(1), (2) and 902(1)
Subject:
Anti-stacking of NSAIDs, add diclofenac (HA) and delete meclofenamic acid from 48-hour NSAIDs.
Purpose:
To enable the Commission to preserve the integrity of pari-mutuel racing while generating reasonable revenue for the support of government.
Text or summary was published
in the November 9, 2016 issue of the Register, I.D. No. SGC-45-16-00004-P.
Final rule as compared with last published rule:
No changes.
Revised rule making(s) were previously published in the State Register on
November 16, 2016.
Text of rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
Kristen M. Buckley, New York State Gaming Commission, One Broadway Center, PO Box 7500, Schenectady, New York 12031-7500, (518) 388-3407, email: [email protected]
Initial Review of Rule
As a rule that does not require a RFA, RAFA or JIS, this rule will be initially reviewed in the calendar year 2023, which is no later than the 5th year after the year in which this rule is being adopted.
Assessment of Public Comment
The Commission received public comments from the New York Racing Association, Inc. (NYRA) and from a horse trainer who is a director on the board of the New York Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association (NYTHA) and chair of NYTHA’s race horse aftercare committee. Both comments were in support of the revised proposal.
| End of Document |