July 2011 Ambulatory Patient Groups (APGs) Payment Methodology

NY-ADR

7/20/11 N.Y. St. Reg. HLT-29-11-00001-E
NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
VOLUME XXXIII, ISSUE 29
July 20, 2011
RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
EMERGENCY RULE MAKING
 
I.D No. HLT-29-11-00001-E
Filing No. 592
Filing Date. Jun. 29, 2011
Effective Date. Jun. 29, 2011
July 2011 Ambulatory Patient Groups (APGs) Payment Methodology
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:
Action taken:
Amendment of Subpart 86-8 of Title 10 NYCRR.
Statutory authority:
Public Health Law, section 2807(2-a)(e)
Finding of necessity for emergency rule:
Preservation of public health.
Specific reasons underlying the finding of necessity:
It is necessary to issue the proposed regulation on an emergency basis in order to meet the regulatory requirement found within the regulation itself to update the Ambulatory Patient Group (APG) weights at least once a year. To meet that requirement, the weights needed to be revised and published in the regulation for January 2010 and updated thereafter. Additionally, the regulation needs to reflect the many software changes made to the APG payment software, known as the APG grouper-pricer, which is a sub-component of the eMedNY Medicaid payment system. These changes include the revised list of If Stand Alone do Not Pay APGs and the ability to reduce APg reimbursement for drugs purchased through the 340B drug benefit program.
There is a compelling interest in enacting these amendments immediately in order to secure federal approval of associated Medicaid State Plan amendments and assure there are no delays in implementation of these provisions. APGs represent the cornerstone to health care reform. Their continued refinement is necessary to assure access to preventive services for all Medicaid recipients.
Subject:
July 2011 Ambulatory Patient Groups (APGs) Payment Methodology.
Purpose:
To refine the APG payment methodology.
Substance of emergency rule:
The amendments to Part 86 of Title 10 (Health) NYCRR are required to update the Ambulatory Patient Groups (APGs) methodology, implemented on December 1, 2008, which governs reimbursement for certain ambulatory care fee-for-service (FFS) Medicaid services. APGs group procedures and medical visits that share similar characteristics and resource utilization patterns so as to pay for services based on relative intensity.
86-8.2 - Definitions
The proposed amendment to section 86-8.2 of Title 10 (Health) NYCRR removes subdivision (r), which defined ambulatory surgery permissible procedures.
86-8.7 - APGs and relative weights
The proposed revision to section 86-8.7 of Title 10 (Health) NYCRR repeals all of section 86-8.7 effective July 1, 2011 and replaces it with a new section 86-8.7 that includes revised APG weights, procedure-based weights, and APG fee schedule fees.
86-8.9 Diagnostic coding and rate computation
The proposed revisions to section 86-8.9 of Title 10 (Health) NYCRR removes subdivision (c), which references ambulatory surgery permissible procedures. Additionally, a new subdivision (c) is added to allow for a reduction of reimbursement for drugs purchased through the 340B drug benefit program. Subdivision (d) is amended to add APG 451 Smoking Cessation Treatment.
86-8.10 Exclusions from payment
The proposed revisions to section 86-8.10 of Title 10 (Health) NYCRR amends subdivision (h) to add APG 465 Class XIII Combined Chemotherapy and Pharmacotherapy and subdivision (i) to add APG 490 Incidental to Medical, Significant Procedure or Therapy Visit to the if stand alone do not pay list.
This notice is intended
to serve only as a notice of emergency adoption. This agency intends to adopt this emergency rule as a permanent rule and will publish a notice of proposed rule making in the State Register at some future date. The emergency rule will expire September 26, 2011.
Text of rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
Katherine Ceroalo, DOH, Bureau of House Counsel, Reg. Affairs Unit, Room 2438, ESP Tower Building, Albany, NY 12237, (518) 473-7488, email: [email protected]
Regulatory Impact Statement
Statutory Authority:
Authority for the promulgation of these regulations is contained in section 2807(2-a)(e) of the Public Health Law, as amended by Part C of Chapter 58 of the Laws of 2008 and Part C of Chapter 58 of the Laws of 2009, which authorize the Commissioner of Health to adopt and amend rules and regulations, subject to the approval of the State Director of the Budget, establishing an Ambulatory Patient Groups methodology for determining Medicaid rates of payment for diagnostic and treatment center services, free-standing ambulatory surgery services and general hospital outpatient clinics, emergency departments and ambulatory surgery services.
Legislative Objectives:
The Legislature's mandate is to convert, where appropriate, Medicaid reimbursement of ambulatory care services to a system that pays differential amounts based on the resources required for each patient visit, as determined through Ambulatory Patient Groups ("APGs"). The APGs refer to the Enhanced Ambulatory Patient Grouping classification system which is owned and maintained by 3M Health Information Systems. The Enhanced Ambulatory Group classification system and the clinical logic underlying that classification system, the EAPG software, and the Definitions Manual associated with that classification system, are all proprietary to 3M Health Information Systems. APG-based Medicaid Fee For Service payment systems have been implemented in several states including: Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Maryland.
Needs and Benefits:
The proposed regulations are in conformance with statutory amendments to provisions of Public Health Law section 2807(2-a), which mandated implementation of a new ambulatory care reimbursement methodology based on APGs.
This reimbursement methodology provides greater reimbursement for high intensity services and relatively less reimbursement for low intensity services. It also allows for greater payment homogeneity for comparable services across all ambulatory care settings (i.e., Outpatient Department, Ambulatory Surgery, Emergency Department, and Diagnostic and Treatment Centers). By linking payments to the specific array of services rendered, APGs will make Medicaid reimbursement more transparent. APGs provide strong fiscal incentives for health care providers to improve the quality of, and access to, preventive and primary care services.
These amendments include updated APG and, procedure-based weights, and APG fee schedule fees, which will provide reimbursement precision and specificity. These amendments also remove all reference to ambulatory surgery permissible procedures list, which no longer exists. Additionally, drugs purchased through the 340B drug benefit program will be reimbursed at a reduced rate and APG 490 INCIDENTAL TO MEDICAL, SIGNIFICANT PROCEDURE OR THERAPY VISIT was added to the If Stand Alone do Not Pay list.
COSTS
Costs for the Implementation of, and Continuing Compliance with this Regulation to the Regulated Entity:
There will be no additional costs to providers as a result of these amendments.
Costs to Local Governments:
There will be no additional costs to local governments as a result of these amendments.
Costs to State Governments:
There will be no additional costs to NYS as a result of these amendments.
Costs to the Department of Health:
There will be no additional costs to the Department of Health as a result of these amendments.
Local Government Mandates:
There are no local government mandates.
Paperwork:
There is no additional paperwork required of providers as a result of these amendments.
Duplication:
This regulation does not duplicate other state or federal regulations.
Alternatives:
These regulations are in conformance with Public Health Law section 2807(2-a)(e). Although the 2009 amendments to PHL 2807(2-a) authorize the Commissioner to adopt rules to establish alternative payment methodologies or to continue to utilize existing payment methodologies where the APG is not yet appropriate or practical for certain services, the utilization of the APG methodology is in its relative infancy and is otherwise continually monitored, adjusted and evaluated for appropriateness by the Department and the providers. This rulemaking is in response to this continually evaluative process.
Federal Standards:
This amendment does not exceed any minimum standards of the federal government for the same or similar subject areas.
Compliance Schedule:
The proposed amendment will become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Effect on Small Business and Local Governments:
For the purpose of this regulatory flexibility analysis, small businesses were considered to be general hospitals, diagnostic and treatment centers, and free-standing ambulatory surgery centers. Based on recent data extracted from providers' submitted cost reports, seven hospitals and 245 DTCs were identified as employing fewer than 100 employees.
Compliance Requirements:
No new reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements are being imposed as a result of these rules.
Professional Services:
No new or additional professional services are required in order to comply with the proposed amendments.
Compliance Costs:
No initial capital costs will be imposed as a result of this rule, nor is there an annual cost of compliance.
Economic and Technological Feasibility:
Small businesses will be able to comply with the economic and technological aspects of this rule. The proposed amendments are intended to further reform the outpatient/ambulatory care fee-for-service Medicaid payment system, which is intended to benefit health care providers, including those with fewer than 100 employees.
Minimizing Adverse Impact:
The proposed amendments apply to certain services of general hospitals, diagnostic and treatment centers and freestanding ambulatory surgery centers. The Department of Health considered approaches specified in section 202-b (1) of the State Administrative Procedure Act in drafting the proposed amendments and rejected them as inappropriate given that this reimbursement system is mandated in statute.
Small Business and Local Government Participation:
These changes do not affect small businesses and local governments.
Rural Area Flexibility Analysis
Effect on Rural Areas:
Rural areas are defined as counties with a population less than 200,000 and, for counties with a population greater than 200,000, includes towns with population densities of 150 persons or less per square mile. The following 43 counties have a population less than 200,000:
AlleganyHamiltonSchenectady
CattaraugusHerkimerSchoharie
CayugaJeffersonSchuyler
ChautauquaLewisSeneca
ChemungLivingstonSteuben
ChenangoMadisonSullivan
ClintonMontgomeryTioga
ColumbiaOntarioTompkins
CortlandOrleansUlster
DelawareOswegoWarren
EssexOtsegoWashington
FranklinPutnamWayne
FultonRensselaerWyoming
GeneseeSt. LawrenceYates
Greene
The following 9 counties have certain townships with population densities of 150 persons or less per square mile:
AlbanyErieOneida
BroomeMonroeOnondaga
DutchessNiagaraOrange
Compliance Requirements:
No new reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements are being imposed as a result of this proposal.
Professional Services:
No new additional professional services are required in order for providers in rural areas to comply with the proposed amendments.
Compliance Costs:
No initial capital costs will be imposed as a result of this rule, nor is there an annual cost of compliance.
Minimizing Adverse Impact:
The proposed amendments apply to certain services of general hospitals, diagnostic and treatment centers and freestanding ambulatory surgery centers. The Department of Health considered approaches specified in section 202-bb (2) of the State Administrative Procedure Act in drafting the proposed amendments and rejected them as inappropriate given that the reimbursement system is mandated in statute.
Opportunity for Rural Area Participation:
These changes do not affect rural areas.
Job Impact Statement
A Job Impact Statement is not required pursuant to Section 201-a(2)(a) of the State Administrative Procedure Act. It is apparent, from the nature and purpose of the proposed regulations, that they will not have a substantial adverse impact on jobs or employment opportunities.
End of Document