Post-Race Blood Gas Testing Procedures for Thoroughbred and Harness Race Horses

NY-ADR

6/27/07 N.Y. St. Reg. RWB-19-07-00004-E
NEW YORK STATE REGISTER
VOLUME XXIX, ISSUE 26
June 27, 2007
RULE MAKING ACTIVITIES
RACING AND WAGERING BOARD
EMERGENCY RULE MAKING
 
I.D No. RWB-19-07-00004-E
Filing No. 589
Filing Date. Jun. 07, 2007
Effective Date. Jun. 07, 2007
Post-Race Blood Gas Testing Procedures for Thoroughbred and Harness Race Horses
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Procedure Act, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action:
Action taken:
Addition of sections 4043.8, 4043.9, 4043.10, 4038.19(g), 4120.13, 4120.14, 4120.15 and 4109.7(f) to Title 9 NYCRR.
Statutory authority:
Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law, sections 101, 207, 227, 301, 305 and 902
Finding of necessity for emergency rule:
Preservation of general welfare.
Specific reasons underlying the finding of necessity:
In Jan. 2005, Federal prosecutors obtained indictments against 17 people related to the operation of an illegal gambling operation, including charges that a trainer had administered an alkalinizing agent to a horse in order to affect the outcome of a race, and subsequently the wagering on that race. In March 2006, trainer Gregory Martin admitted in Federal court that he administered a “milkshake” to a horse before the opening race at Aqueduct Raceway on Dec. 18, 2003. The horse went on to win by 10 lengths. According to an article in The Thoroughbred Times, Martin told the court that after he administered the milkshake to the horse, he contacted an associate with the understanding that such information would be passed along to other bettors in an alleged gambling ring. According to the Justice Department, this was not an isolated incident and such violations occurred regularly. This case has brought national attention to the issue of milkshaking and the need to adopt testing programs and penalties for such “milkshaking” practices. Clearly, the practice of milkshaking race horses is detrimental to the integrity of the sport of horse racing, erodes public confidence in pari-mutuel wagering events, and invites criminal abuse and exploitation.
Subject:
Post-race blood gas testing procedures for thoroughbred and harness race horses.
Purpose:
To detect and deter the prohibited practice known as “milkshaking.”
Substance of emergency rule:
4043.8(a) Authorizes pre-race and post-race methods of testing thoroughbred racehorses to detect excess levels of total carbon dioxide (TCO2), establishes the threshold for excess TCO2 at 37 millimoles per liter, and 39 millimoles for horses that have been administered furosemide.
4043.8(b) Establishes procedures in cases where excess TCO2 levels are found and an owner or trainer challenges the findings to assert a claim of naturally occurring excess TCO2 levels in a horse.
4043.8(c) Establishes minimum standards for guarded quarantine of a thoroughbred race horse at a race track operated by a track association.
4043.8(d) Establishes minimum penalties for excess TCO2 violations in a thoroughbred racehorse ranging from a minimum 60-day license suspension and $1,000 fine for a first offense to a minimum one-year license suspension with a $5,000 fine with a possible additional suspension term prescribed by the Board. Authorizes an additional two-year suspension for race-day medication violation. Includes provision for purse redistribution in case of a positive excess TCO2 test.
4043.8(e) Directs that horses that are found to have excess TCO2 levels will be disqualified, any monies won will be forfeited/redistributed and pre-race detention shall be imposed.
4043.9(a) Establishes pre-race detention procedures and requirements where a racehorse has been tested and found to have excess TCO2 levels that are not physiologically normal, including a minimum six-month period of detention.
4043.9(b) Establishes pre-race detention where a trainer has had more than one racehorse under his or her care have excess TCO2 levels in a 12-month period, including a minimum eight-month period of detention for all horses under the trainer's care.
4043.10 Establishes punishment for failure to cooperate in the thoroughbred TCO2 testing program.
4038.19(g) Allows claimants in a claiming race to void a claim on a thoroughbred horse that is subsequently found to have excess TCO2 levels that are not physiologically normal.
4120.13(a) Authorizes pre-race and post-race testing of harness racehorses to detect excess levels of total carbon dioxide (TCO2), establishes the threshold for excess TCO2 at 37 millimoles per liter, and 39 millimoles for horses that have been administered furosemide.
4120.13(b) Establishes procedures in cases where excess TCO2 levels are found and an owner or trainer challenges the findings to assert a claim of naturally occurring excess TCO2 levels in a horse.
4120.13(c) Establishes minimum standards for guarded quarantine of a harness racehorse at a race track operated by a track association.
4120.13(d) Establishes minimum penalties for excess TCO2 violations in a harness racehorse ranging from a minimum 60-day license suspension and $1,000 fine for a first offense to a minimum one-year license suspension with a $5,000 fine with a possible additional suspension term prescribed by the Board. Authorizes an additional two-year suspension for race-day medication violations. Includes provision for purse redistribution in case of a positive excess TCO2 test.
4120.13(e) Directs that horses that are found to have excess TCO2 levels will be disqualified, any monies won will be forfeited/redistributed and pre-race detention shall be imposed.
4120.14(a) Establishes pre-race detention procedures and requirements where a racehorse has been tested and found to have excess TCO2 levels that are not physiologically normal, including a minimum six-month period of detention.
4120.14(b) Establishes pre-race detention where a trainer has had more than one racehorse under his or her care have excess TCO2 levels in a 12-month period, including a minimum eight-month period of detention for all horses under the trainer's care.
4120.15 Establishes punishment for failure to cooperate in the Board's TCO2 testing.
4109.7(f) Allows claimants in a claiming race to void a claim on a harness racehorse that is subsequently found to have excess TCO2 levels.
This notice is intended
to serve only as a notice of emergency adoption. This agency intends to adopt the provisions of this emergency rule as a permanent rule, having previously published a notice of emergency rule making, I.D. No. RWB-19-07-00004-P, Issue of May 9, 2007. The emergency rule will expire September 4, 2007.
Text of emergency rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from:
Gail Pronti, Secretary to the Board, Racing and Wagering Board, One Broadway Center, Suite 600, Schenectady, NY 12305-2553, (518) 395-5400, e-mail: [email protected]
Regulatory Impact Statement
(a) Statutory authority. Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law, sections 101, 207, 227, 301, 305 and 902.
(b) Legislative objectives. This amendment advances the legislative objective of regulating the conduct of pari-mutuel wagering in a manner designed to maintain the integrity of racing while generating a reasonable revenue for the support of government.
(c) Needs and benefits. This rulemaking is necessary to assure the public's confidence and continue the high degree of integrity in racing at the pari-mutuel betting tracks. Through pre-race and post-race testing, this rulemaking will detect and deter the administration of alkali agents to thoroughbred racehorses and harness racehorses for the purpose of affecting the performance of such horse during a pari-mutuel wagering race.
The administration of alkali agents into a racehorse is commonly known as “milkshaking,” where a person administers a mixture of sodium bicarbonate, sugar and water to a horse prior to a race mitigate the effects of lactic acid on the horse's muscles during the race, thereby gaining an advantage. Lactic acid is a naturally occurring byproduct of intense muscular exercise in mammals, and the accumulation of lactic acid in such muscles causes fatigue. Some people associated with racehorses believe that the administration of an alkaline substance, such as bicarbonate of soda, can neutralize the effect of lactic acid in a horse's muscles. This has resulted in the use of alkalizing agents, or “milkshakes” which are administered to a racehorse in an attempt to alter the performance of the horse. Based on this belief, people have administered milkshakes to racehorses on the day of a race with the intent to gain a racing advantage.
This rulemaking is necessary to establish empirical standards and testing procedures for the enforcement of Board Rule 4043.3(d) and Board Rule 4120.3(d), which apply to thoroughbred and harness racehorses respectively and state “No person shall, attempt to, or cause, solicit, request, or conspire with another or others to … administer a mixture of bicarbonate of soda and sugar in any of their forms in any manner to a horse within 24 hours of a racing program at which such horse is programmed to race. It shall be the trainer's responsibility to prevent such administration.”
Horses that have received an alkalizing agent will exhibit elevated levels of TCO2 over and above normal levels. This rulemaking will establish the ion selective electrode method with a clinical auto analyzer as a standard means of detecting elevated TCO2 in horses. The rule will establish a TCO2 threshhold of 37 millimoles per liter for horses who have not been administered furosemide (Lasix) prior to a race, and 39 millimoles for horses that have been administered furosemide prior to a race.
In January 2005, the U.S. Justice Department arrested a New York licensed thoroughbred trainer and a prominent New York harness driver and charged the two with milkshaking a thoroughbred at Aqueduct Raceway in December 2003 to increase the odds that the horse, A One Rocket, would win. According to the Justice Department, this was not an isolated incident and such violations occurred regularly. This case has brought national attention to the issue of milkshaking and the need to adopt testing programs and penalties for such “milkshaking” practices. Clearly, the practice of milkshaking race horses is detrimental to the integrity of the sport of horse racing, erodes public confidence in pari-mutuel wagering events, and invites criminal abuse and exploitation.
This rulemaking will benefit thoroughbred and harness racing by ensuring the betting public that horses that compete in pari-mutuel races have not been tampered with through the administration of alkali agents, thereby ensuring that no extraordinary advantage has been given to the horse through prohibited substances.
(d) Costs.
(i) Thoroughbred horse owners may be subject to the cost of a pre-race guarded quarantine imposed upon any single horse found to have excess TCO2 levels that has not been determined to be physiologically normal for such horse. The licensed track association sponsoring the race is responsible for making available a pre-race quarantine stall, and for maintaining an access log system in either paper or electronic form. The length of time for such quarantine shall be determined by the stewards or judges, and will have an impact on the cost of guarded quarantine. The cost of a paper log is approximately $10 retail for a ring binder and 500 pages of paper. The cost of an electronic record, such as a personal computer or laptop computer, starts at $400 in ordinary retail stores.
(ii) There are no costs imposed upon the Racing and Wagering Board, the state or local government because the TCO2 testing program will be implemented utilizing the Board's existing medication testing program, personnel and facilities.
(iii) The Board cannot fully provide a statement of costs the trainers for pre-race guarded quarantine because the actual cost of establishing a pre-race guarded quarantine varies greatly from location to location in New York State, and the physical characteristics of the buildings within which a horse of quarantined. All horses that race at a New York State thoroughbred or harness racetrack are currently afforded stable space for free, so the only added cost that can be expected will be the cost of a guard. A pre-race guarded quarantine may require one guard per horse, or one guard for many horses, depending upon the access points that need to be controlled for an effective guarded quarantine. The Board's rulemaking requires that the subject horse is kept in an area where access to the subject horse is restricted to authorized licensed trainers, owners and veterinarians as submitted by the owner, that guards maintain a record of all licensed persons who have had access to the horse while in guarded quarantine, along with the time and purpose of the visit. In addition to the distinctive limitations that the guarded quarantine barn will have upon the cost, the wages of a guard varies depending upon the racetrack itself. According to track representatives, the hourly cost of guard may range from $7 per hour up to $20 per hour, depending on the individual racetrack, experience required for the specific duties (e.g. a stable guard who is responsible for surveillance only compared to a quarantine supervisor who is responsible for also identifying illegal paraphernalia, treatments or procedures) and local pay scale. The minimum time that a horse is to be quarantined is six hours, and the maximum time for quarantine is 72 hours.
(e) Paperwork. Owners of any horse that has been found to have an excess levels of TCO2 will be required to submit a letter to the steward or judge of the track where the subject horse is to race, stating that the subject horse has a normally elevated level of TCO2. Such a letter is necessary for a horse to continue racing while under a guarded quarantine. Track associations will be required to maintain access logs, either paper or electronic, for a period of 90 days after the guarded quarantine period.
(f) Local government mandates. This rulemaking will not impose any program, service, duty, or responsibility upon any county, city, town, village, school district fire district or other special district.
(g) Duplication. Since the New York State Racing &Wagering Board is exclusively responsible for the regulation of pari-mutuel wagering activities in New York State, there are no other relevant rules or other legal requirements of the state or federal government regarding total carbon dioxide testing of thoroughbred racehorses and harness racehorses in New York State.
(h) Alternative approaches. The Board did not consider any other significant alternatives because no other significant alternates are available. The rulemaking is based upon an established TCO2 testing program already adopted and in use by the New Jersey Racing Commission. The testing procedure included in this rulemaking is the only TCO2 test that has been reviewed and declared reliable by a state court, in this case, the New Jersey Supreme Court recognized the reliability of the Beckman test generally and as applied by the New Jersey Racing Commission (Campbell v. New Jersey Racing Commission, New Jersey Supreme Court, 169 N.J. 579, 781 A.2d 1035, October 11, 2001.) The TCO2 threshold levels in this rule are supported by findings of the Canadian Pari-Mutual Agency, which are published “Effects of Sampling and Analysis Times and Furosemide Administration on TCO2 Concentrations in Stadardbred and Thoroughbred Horses.” This paper was presented at the 13th International Conference of Racing Analysts and Veterinarians in Cambridge, U.K., in 2000 and published in the Conference Proceedings. The data in this study supports the thresholds of 37 mmol/L (non-furosemide) and 39 mmol/L (furosemide) which has been adopted in both Canada and Australia.
(i) Federal standards. There are no federal standards applicable to the subject area of state-regulated parimutuel wagering activity.
(j) Compliance schedule. The practice known as “milkshaking” of horses in already prohibited by rule under 9E NYCRR 4043.3 for thoroughbred racehorses and 9E NYCRR 4120.3 for harness racehorses. All of the provisions of this rulemaking shall be effective immediately upon filing with the Department of State.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, Rural Area Flexibility Analysis and Job Impact Statement
This proposal does not require a Regulatory Flexibility Statement, Rural Area Flexibility Statement or Job Impact Statement as the amendment would expand the existing medication testing rules to include a test for alkalizing agents in thoroughbred and harness race horses. This testing will utilize the current framework for post-race testing. The pre-race testing component will merely require that a veterinarian take a few minutes to obtain a blood sample from a horse, which is a routine procedure and imposes no new burden upon regulated parties. These amendments do not impact upon State Administrative Procedure Act section 102(8), nor do they affect employment. The proposal will not impose an adverse economic impact on reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements on small businesses in rural or urban areas nor on employment opportunities. The rule does not impose any significant technological changes on the industry for the reasons set forth above, because the Board rules has existing rules for post-race testing for the presence of performance altering drugs and other substances.
End of Document