Home Table of Contents

WPIC 5.11 Soliciting False Evidence or Suppression of Evidence—Third Person

11 WAPRAC WPIC 5.11Washington Practice Series TMWashington Pattern Jury Instructions--Criminal

11 Wash. Prac., Pattern Jury Instr. Crim. WPIC 5.11 (5th Ed)
Washington Practice Series TM
Washington Pattern Jury Instructions--Criminal
January 2024 Update
Washington State Supreme Court Committee on Jury Instructions
Part II. Evidence and Guides for Its Consideration
WPIC CHAPTER 5. General Principles of Evidence
WPIC 5.11 Soliciting False Evidence or Suppression of Evidence—Third Person
(The WPI Committee recommends that no instruction be given on this subject.)
COMMENT
As explained in the Comment to WPIC 5.10 (Soliciting False Evidence or Suppression of Evidence—Defendant), the defendant's attempt to prevent a witness from testifying, or engaging in similar acts to suppress evidence, may be admissible to demonstrate consciousness of guilt. If a third person has done so on the defendant's behalf, however, the evidence is admissible only if the State shows that the third person was acting at the defendant's request, or with the defendant's knowledge and consent. See generally, Tegland, 5 Washington Practice, Evidence Law and Practice § 402.4 (6th ed.) As with WPIC 5.10 (Soliciting False Evidence or Suppression of Evidence—Defendant), the WPI Committee recommends that no instruction be given on this subject because it tends to single out or emphasize certain evidence.
[Current as of December 2018.]
End of Document