(1) not all sex offenders are equally dangerous. Some sex offenders may pose a high risk of committing a new sexual crime; others may pose only a low risk;

(2) all reasonable efforts should be made in to avoid an ill-advised concentration of sex offenders in certain neighborhoods and localities. What constitutes such a concentration will depend on many factors, and may vary depending on housing availability and the locality and community. In addition, it is sometimes safer to house sex offenders together. Law enforcement, probation, and parole officers may more effectively monitor offenders, and service providers may more easily offer transitional services to offenders in these congregate settings. Further, some social service officials and departments rely on congregate housing for sex offenders who seek emergency shelter because of the limited, or lack of other housing options available for this population. All public officials who are responsible for finding or approving housing for sex offenders should recognize that an over-concentration of sex offenders may create risks and burdens on the surrounding community, and that their responsibility is to make judgments that are reasonable under the circumstances;

(3) all social service districts are required by statute, regulation and directive to arrange temporary housing assistance for eligible homeless individuals, including those who are sex offenders;

(4) to reduce recidivism it is important that offenders be able to re-enter society and become productive and law-abiding citizens whenever possible. A stable living situation and access to employment and support services are important factors that can help offenders to successfully re-enter society;

(5) maintaining and/or finding suitable housing for sex offenders is an enormous challenge that impacts all areas of the State. Offenders reside in all regions of the State and may have long-established residences in their respective communities. Even offenders who do not have such long-established relationships are often discharged from prison to the community where they previously lived. As a result, it is not appropriate for any one community or county to bear an inappropriate burden in housing sex offenders because another community has attempted to shift its responsibility for those offenders onto other areas of the State. The proliferation of local ordinances imposing residency restrictions upon sex offenders, while well-intentioned, have made it more challenging for the State and local authorities to address the difficulties in finding secure and appropriate housing for sex offenders;

(6) decisions as to the housing and supervision of sex offenders should take into account all relevant factors and no one factor will necessarily be dispositive. These factors should include, but not be limited to, the factors enumerated in the statute, the risk posed by the offender, the nature of the underlying offense, whether housing offenders together or apart is safer and more feasible, the most effective method to supervise and provide services to offenders, and the availability of appropriate housing, employment, treatment and support.

(1) Division of Parole staff will investigate the proposed release program of all Level 2 and Level 3 sex offenders being released to the division's jurisdiction from any New York State correctional facility with the objective of attaining the optimum residential placement that is available with the community proposed by the offender. As appropriate, such investigation shall include but not be limited to, consideration being given to the following factors:

(2) The approval of a residential placement by Division of Parole staff will take into consideration:

(1) When the Division of Parole is notified by a local social services district of its determination that a Level 2 or Level 3 sex offender for whom a notice pursuant to Executive Law section 259-c(17) was received by such district is in immediate need of shelter, and an investigation and approval of the potential residential placement by the Division of Parole is required, the division shall investigate the district's proposed placement in accord with the factors set forth in subdivision (f) of this section. Following such investigation, the Division of Parole shall provide the local social services district with the results of its investigation and its approval or disapproval of the proposed placement.

(2) When an investigation by the Division of Parole is impracticable within the timeframe necessary for the local social services district to meet the immediate housing need of the offender, such investigation shall be completed within 48 hours of the division's receipt of the local social services district's notice that such residential placement was necessary.