(1) The department may withhold payments under the program, in whole or in part, when it has determined that a provider has abused the program or has committed an unacceptable practice. The department's determination that a provider has abused the program, or has committed an unacceptable practice may consist of preliminary findings by the department's audit or utilization review staff of unacceptable practices or significant overpayments, information from a State professional licensing or certifying agency of an ongoing investigation of a provider involving fraud, abuse, professional misconduct or unprofessional conduct, or information from a State investigating or prosecutorial agency or other law enforcement organization of an ongoing investigation of a provider for fraud or criminal conduct involving the program. The department may withhold payment of current and future claims to the provider and any affiliate.

(2) The department must withhold payments under the program, in whole or in part, when it has determined or has been notified that a provider is the subject of a pending investigation of a credible allegation of fraud unless the department finds good cause not to withhold payments in accordance with 42 C.F.R. 455.23. A credible allegation of fraud is an allegation that has indicia of reliability and has been verified by the department, or the Medicaid fraud control unit, or another State agency, or law enforcement organization.

(1)

(2) state that the withholding is for a temporary period only and recite the circumstances under which the withhold will be terminated;

(3) specify whether the withholding applies to all or only some claims and identify which claims if not all claims are involved; and

(4) advise of the right to submit written arguments and documentation in opposition to the withholding and how to submit them in accordance with subdivision (e) of this section.

(1) When initiated by the department prior to issuance of a draft audit report or notice of proposed agency action, the withholding will not continue for more than 90 days unless a written draft audit report or notice of proposed agency action is sent to the provider. Issuance of the draft report or notice of proposed action may extend the withholding until an amount reasonably calculated to satisfy the overpayment is withheld, pending a final determination on the matter.

(2) When initiated by the department after issuance of a draft audit report or notice of proposed agency action, the withholding will not continue for more than 90 days unless a written final audit report or notice of agency action is sent to the provider. Issuance of the report or notice of action may extend the withholding until an amount reasonably calculated to satisfy the overpayment is withheld, pending a final determination on the matter.

(3) When initiated by another State agency or law enforcement organization, the withholding may continue until the agency or prosecuting authority determines that there is insufficient evidence to support an action against the provider or its affiliate, or until the agency or criminal proceedings are completed.

(4) When initiated by the department when it has determined or has been notified that a provider is the subject of a pending investigation of a credible allegation of fraud all withholding actions will be temporary and will not continue after either of the following:

(1) A provider or its affiliate that is the subject of the withholding is not entitled to an administrative hearing, but may, within 30 days of the date of the notice, submit written arguments and documentation that the withhold should be removed.

(2) Within 60 days of receiving written arguments or documentation in response to a withhold, the department will review the determination and notify the provider or its affiliate of the results of that review. After the review, the determination to impose a withhold may be affirmed, reversed or modified, in whole or in part.

(3) A decision by the department to affirm, reverse or modify a withhold on appeal shall not be a determination of the merits of any investigation initiated by another State agency, the Medicaid fraud control unit, or other law enforcement organization.