(a) A judicial appointee shall abstain from public comment that relates to a proceeding pending or impending in any court and that might reasonably be expected to affect the outcome or impair the fairness of that proceeding and shall require similar abstention on the part of court personnel subject to the judicial appointee's direction and control. This Rule does not prohibit a judicial appointee from making public statements in the course of official duties or from explaining for public information the procedures of the court.

(b) With respect to a case, controversy, or issue that is likely to come before the court, a judicial appointee shall not make a commitment, pledge, or promise that is inconsistent with the impartial performance of the adjudicative duties of the office.

(c) Notwithstanding the restrictions in sections (a) and (b) of this Rule, a judicial appointee may make public statements in the course of official duties, may explain court procedures, and may comment on any proceeding in which the judicial appointee is a litigant in a non-official capacity.

[1] This Rule's restrictions are essential to the maintenance of the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary.

[2] This Rule does not prohibit a judicial appointee from commenting on proceedings in which the judicial appointee is a litigant in a personal capacity. In cases in which the judicial appointee is a litigant in an official capacity, such as a writ of mandamus, the judicial appointee must not comment publicly.

[3] “Court personnel,” as used in section (a) of this Rule does not include the attorneys in a proceeding before the judicial appointee. The comment of attorneys in this regard is governed by Rule 19-303.6 of the Maryland Attorneys' Rules of Professional Conduct.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.10 of Rule 16-814 (2016).