§ 2855. Spark-Ignition Marine Watercraft Standards for > 30 kW Engines.
13 CA ADC § 2855Barclays Official California Code of Regulations
Barclays California Code of Regulations
Title 13. Motor Vehicles (Refs & Annos)
Division 3. Air Resources Board
Chapter 15. Additional Off-Road Vehicles and Engines Pollution Control Requirements
Article 4. Evaporative Emissions Requirements for Spark-Ignition Marine Watercraft with Gasoline-Fueled Engines
13 CCR § 2855
§ 2855. Spark-Ignition Marine Watercraft Standards for > 30 kW Engines.
(a) For MY 2018 and later, SIMW using greater than 30 kW SIME must comply with the evaporative emissions standards, test procedures, and test fuels as specified below in the Evaporative Emissions Design Standards for Trailerable > 30 kW SIMW Table for trailerable SIMW and the Evaporative Emissions Design Standards for Nontrailerable > 30 kW SIMW Table for nontrailerable SIMW. The Alternative Evaporative Emissions Performance-Based Standard for > 30 kW SIMW Table specifies an alternative evaporative emissions performance-based standard for SIMW using greater than 30 kW engines.
The two tables below hereby incorporate by reference the following documents:
Evaporative Emissions Design Standards for Trailerable > 30 kW SIMW Table
Diurnal Requirement: Canister | Diurnal Requirement: Non-Canister3 |
---|
MY Effective Date | Fuel Hose Permeation1 (grams/m2 /day ROG2a) | Fuel Tank Permeation (grams/m2/day ROG2a) | Performance (grams/gal./day HC2b) | Design (Minimum Working Capacity) | General | Pressure Relief Valve Minimum (kPa) | Meets Fuel Injection Definition or Equivalent Performance Standard (grams HC2b/hour) |
---|
Canister (g/gal)4 | Carbon (g/l)5 |
---|
2018 and 2019 | 10.06 | 0.70 | 0.25 | 3.8 | 94 | 65 percent reduction from uncontrolled HC emissions | 7.35 | 0.4 |
2020 and Later | 5.06,7 | 0.70 | 0.25 | 3.8 | 94 | 65 percent reduction from uncontrolled HC emissions | 7.35 | 0.4 |
Test Procedure | TP-15048 or SAE J17378 | TP-15048 | TP-15039 | TP-902 Attachment 1 | ASTM D5228-9210 | TP-15039 | TP-150511 | TP-15029 |
Notes |
1 The following fuel hose standards also apply to auxiliary engines on SIMW using > 30 kW SIME. The fuel hose permeation standards do not apply to under the cowl fuel lines. As an alternative to 40 C.F.R., § 1060.515 (2008), component manufacturers can test following SAE, Test Procedure to Determine the Hydrocarbon Losses from Fuel Tubes, Hoses, Fittings, and Fuel Line Assemblies by Recirculation (May 2013), SAE J1737. |
2a Reactive Organic Gas (ROG). |
2b Hydrocarbon (HC). |
3 For non-canister vented systems, a venting control efficiency standard of 65 percent must be met. To determine the venting control efficiency, a venting control test must be performed following 40 C.F.R., § 1060.525 (2008), (or TP-1503, if applicable) with E10 CERT fuel and then compared against an identical uncontrolled venting test. Alternatively, an estimate of uncontrolled venting can be calculated using the fuel tank vapor generation equation (6) in Reddy, Prediction of Fuel Vapor Generation from a Vehicle Fuel Tank as a Function of Fuel RVP and Temperature (Nov. 2004), SAE Technical Paper Series 892089. |
4 Grams of vapor storage capacity per gallon of nominal fuel tank capacity. |
5 Grams per liter of carbon working capacity with minimum carbon volume of 0.040 liters per gallon of nominal fuel tank capacity. The carbon canister must have a minimum effective length-to-diameter ratio of 3.5 and the vapor flow must be directed with the intent of using the whole carbon bed. |
6 Starting with MY 2018 and thereafter, if the Executive Officer determines that all of the following criteria are met: |
1. That a 5.0 g/m2/day fuel hose has been certified, and |
2. That a certified 5.0 g/m2/day fuel hose is commercially available in common sizes, then the fuel hose permeation standard will change to 5.0 g/m2/day, effective no earlier than MY 2020 or two years after the finding. |
7 Using a test temperature of 40°C. As an alternative to 40 C.F.R., § 1060.515 (2008), component manufacturers can test following SAE, Test Procedure to Determine the Hydrocarbon Losses from Fuel Tubes, Hoses, Fittings, and Fuel Line Assemblies by Recirculation (May 2013), SAE J1737. |
8 Using a test fuel of either E10 CERT or CE 10. As an alternative for fuel tank testing, component manufacturers can certify at 1.4 grams/m2/day at 40°C. |
9 Using E10 CERT fuel. |
10 ASTM, Standard Test Method for Determination of Butane Working Capacity of Activated Carbon (2010), ASTM D5228-92, West Conshohocken, PA; |
11 As an alternative to TP-1503 testing for pressure relief valves, component manufacturers can perform a leak test performance test of the pressure relief valve following TP-1505. A SIMW using a sealed evaporative control system to a positive pressure of at least 7.35kPa (1.05 PSI)] will be deemed compliant with the 65 percent HC reduction requirement. The pressure relief valve must also be tested and pass TP-1505 durability requirements. |
Evaporative Emissions Design Standards for Nontrailerable > 30 kW SIMW Table
Diurnal Requirement: Canister | Diurnal Requirement: Non-Canister3 |
---|
MY Effective Date | Fuel Hose Permeation1 (grams/m2/day ROG2a) | Fuel Tank Permeation (grams/m2/day ROG2a) | Performance (grams/gal./day HC2b) | Design (Minimum Working Capacity) | General | Pressure Relief Valve Minimum (kPa) | Meets Fuel Injection Definition or Equivalent Performance Standard (grams HC2b/hour) |
---|
Canister (g/gal)4 | Carbon (g/l)5 |
---|
2018 and 2019 | 10.06 | 0.70 | 0.25 | 1.5 | 94 | 65 percent reduction from uncontrolled HC emissions | 7.35 | 0.4 |
2020 and Later | 5.06,7 | 0.70 | 0.25 | 1.5 | 94 | 65 percent reduction from uncontrolled HC emissions | 7.35 | 0.4 |
Test Procedure | TP-15048 or SAE J17378 | TP-15048 | TP-15039 | TP-902 Attachment 1 | ASTM D5228-9210 | TP-15039 | TP-150511 | TP-150212 |
Notes |
1 The following fuel hose standards also apply to auxiliary engines on SIMW using > 30 kW SIME. The fuel hose permeation standards do not apply to under the cowl fuel lines. As an alternative to 40 C.F.R., § 1060.515 (2008), component manufacturers can test following SAE, Test Procedure to Determine the Hydrocarbon Losses from Fuel Tubes, Hoses, Fittings, and Fuel Line Assemblies by Recirculation (May 2013), SAE J1737. |
2a Reactive Organic Gas (ROG). |
2b Hydrocarbon (HC). |
3 For non-canister vented systems, a venting control efficiency standard of 65 percent must be met. To determine the venting control efficiency, a venting control test must be performed following 40 C.F.R., § 1060.525 (2008), (or TP-1503, if applicable) with E10 CERT fuel and then compared against an identical uncontrolled venting test. Alternatively, an estimate of uncontrolled venting can be calculated using the fuel tank vapor generation equation (6) in Reddy, Prediction of Fuel Vapor Generation from a Vehicle Fuel Tank as a Function of Fuel RVP and Temperature (Nov. 2004), SAE Technical Paper Series 892089. |
4 Grams of vapor storage capacity per gallon of nominal fuel tank capacity. |
5 Grams per liter of carbon working capacity with minimum carbon volume of 0.016 liters per gallon of nominal fuel tank capacity. The carbon canister must have a minimum effective length-to-diameter ratio of 3.5 and the vapor flow must be directed with the intent of using the whole carbon bed. |
6 Starting with MY 2018 and thereafter, if the Executive Officer determines that all of the following criteria are met: |
1. That a 5.0 g/m2/day fuel hose has been certified, and |
2. That a certified 5.0 g/m2/day fuel hose is commercially available in common sizes, then the fuel hose permeation standard will change to 5.0 g/m2/day, effective no earlier than MY 2020 or two years after the finding. |
7 Using a test temperature of 40°C. As an alternative to 40 C.F.R., § 1060.515 (2008), component manufacturers can test following SAE, Test Procedure to Determine the Hydrocarbon Losses from Fuel Tubes, Hoses, Fittings, and Fuel Line Assemblies by Recirculation (May 2013), SAE J1737. |
8 Using a test fuel of either E10 CERT or CE 10. As an alternative for fuel tank testing, component manufacturers can certify at 1.4 grams/m2/day at 40°C. |
9 Using U.S. EPA certification gasoline with 9 RVP. |
10 ASTM D5228-92(2010), Standard Test Method for Determination of Butane Working Capacity of Activated Carbon, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010 |
11 As an alternative to TP-1503 testing for pressure relief valves, component manufacturers can perform a leak test performance test of the pressure relief valve following TP-1505. A SIMW using a sealed evaporative control system to a positive pressure of at least 7.35kPa (1.05PSI) will be deemed compliant with the 65 percent HC reduction requirement. The pressure relief valve must also be tested and pass TP-1505 durability requirements. |
12 Using E10 CERT fuel. |
Alternative Evaporative Emissions Performance-Based Standard for > 30 kW SIMW Table
(1) Deck Fill Plate Compatibility Standard. All deck fill plates on SIMW shall conform to all specifications for the filler pipe sealing surface in Figure 1of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) “Road vehicles- Filler pipes and openings of motor vehicle fuel tanks - Vapor recovery system” standard ISO-13331-1995(E) as adopted June 1, 1995. Alternative deck fill plate designs may be used if they provide a filler pipe sealing surface for a vapor recovery nozzle as defined in CP-201, section 4.7 (as incorporated by reference). Manufacturers who wish to use an alternative design must submit the design to ARB staff for an engineering analysis and obtain Executive Officer approval.
Compatibility Standards Table
(c) Beginning with MY 2018, if the Executive Officer determines that a fuel hose specified in Evaporative Emissions Design Standards for Trailerable > 30 kW SIMW Table and/or Evaporative Emissions Design Standards for Nontrailerable > 30 kW SIMW Table meets the following criteria: (1) That a 5.0 g/m2/day fuel hose has been certified, and (2) That a certified 5.0 g/m2/day fuel hose is commercially available in common sizes, then the fuel hose permeation standard will change to 5.0 g/m2/day with a test temperature of 40°C, effective no earlier than MY 2020 or two years after the determination by the Executive Officer.
(1) In determining whether the fuel hose specified in the Evaporative Emissions Design Standards for Trailerable > 30 kW SIMW Table and/or Evaporative Emissions Design Standards for Nontrailerable > 30 kW SIMW Table meets the criteria of section (b), the Executive Officer shall also verify that the fuel hose:
Credits
Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, 43018, 43101, 43102 and 43104, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 43013, 43017, 43018, 43101, 43102, 43104, 43105, 43150, 43151, 43152, 43153, 43154, 43205.5, 43210, 43210.5, 43211 and 43212, Health and Safety Code.
History
1. New section filed 2-8-2016; operative 4-1-2016 (Register 2016, No. 7).
This database is current through 3/15/24 Register 2024, No. 11.
Cal. Admin. Code tit. 13, § 2855, 13 CA ADC § 2855
End of Document |