§ 7078. Evaluation Criteria.
25 CA ADC § 7078Barclays Official California Code of Regulations
25 CCR § 7078
§ 7078. Evaluation Criteria.
(a) Except for ED OTC activities, individual activity types will be evaluated against other activities of the same type. Where demand for a particular activity exceeds the amount of funds available, the applications for that activity shall be rated and ranked according to the rating criteria set forth in this Section. Activities will be funded in rank order, with the highest rated activities within each activity type funded first until all funds allocated for that activity, pursuant to Section 7076, have been awarded
(b) Applications may be submitted for Planning and Technical Assistance as the sole activity or in combination with other eligible activities. Applications submitted for Planning and Technical Assistance in combination with other eligible activities shall be eligible for funding only if at least one eligible activity is funded. The amount of funds available for Planning and Technical Assistance, as announced in the NOFA, shall be allocated between sole PTA applications and PTA applications submitted in combination with other eligible activities based on the relative amount requested. Applications will be ranked, if needed, per Section 7078(d)(7) to resolve a tie-breaker
(A) NEED and BENEFIT: | Up to 400 points |
The Department will assign points based on the seriousness of the locality's community development needs, and the impact the program will have on those needs using the following criteria:
1. Need: (250 out of 400 points) | ||
i. Overcrowding (both HA and HR) | 125 | |
ii. Home Ownership Rate (HA) or | ||
iii. Age of Housing Stock (HR | 125 | |
2. Benefit (150 out of 400 points) | ||
i. Low-Mod Percentage | 100 | |
ii. Poverty Percentage | 50 | |
(B) READINESS: | Up to 300 points |
Readiness of the proposed activity as demonstrated by an activity implementation plan, local government approvals, design progress, and sufficient funding to complete the project as applicable. Readiness points will be based on:
1. Activity Specific Operator Experience | Up to 150 | |
2. Program Guidelines | 100 | |
3. Waiting List of Pre-Screened Applicants | 50 | |
(C) CAPACITY: | Up to 200 points |
Capacity to implement the proposed activity, as demonstrated by performance, including timeliness of clearance of Special Conditions, reporting and cooperation in clearing audit and monitoring findings.
Capacity points based on:
1. Timely Clearance of Special Conditions | 60 | |
2. In-House Organizational Capacity for General Administration and Program Oversight | 40 | |
3. Reporting Points (point deductions for missing reports) | 70 | |
4. Cooperation/Compliance in Clearing Audit or Monitoring Findings | 30 | |
(D) STATE OBJECTIVES: | Up to 100 points |
iv. Imbalance in the population served in prior years’ awards such as smaller jurisdictions compared to larger jurisdictions, general program beneficiaries compared to special needs groups such as farm workers, under-trained work force, or historically unsuccessful or inactive applicants compared to active, successful applicants.
(A) NEED and BENEFIT: | Up to 400 points |
The Department will assign points based on the seriousness of the locality's community development needs, and the impact the program will have on those needs using the following criteria:
1. Need: (250 out of 400 points) | ||
i. Overcrowding | 125 | |
ii. Rental Vacancy Rate | 125 | |
2. Benefit (150 out of 400 points) | ||
i. Low-Mod Percentage | 100 | |
ii. Poverty Percentage | 50 | |
(B) READINESS: | Up to 300 points |
Readiness of the proposed activity as demonstrated by an activity implementation plan, local government approvals, design progress, and sufficient funding to complete the project as applicable. Readiness points will be based on:
1. Activity Specific Operator Experience | Up to 200 | |
2. All Funding In Place | 75 | |
3. Site Control | 25 | |
(C) CAPACITY: | Up to 200 points |
Capacity to implement the proposed activity, as demonstrated by performance, including timeliness of clearance of Special Conditions, reporting and cooperation in clearing audit and monitoring findings. Capacity points based on:
1. Timely Clearance of Special Conditions | 60 | |
2. In-House Organizational Capacity for General Administration and Program Oversight | 40 | |
3. Reporting Points (point deductions for missing reports) | 70 | |
4. Cooperation/Compliance in Clearing Audit or Monitoring Findings | 30 | |
(D) STATE OBJECTIVES: | Up to 100 points |
iv. Imbalance in the population served in prior years’ awards such as smaller jurisdictions compared to larger jurisdictions, general program beneficiaries compared to special needs groups such as farm workers, under-trained work force, or historically unsuccessful or inactive applicants compared to active, successful applicants.
(A) NEED and Benefit: | Up to 400 points |
The Department will assign points based on the seriousness of the locality's community development needs, and the impact the program will have on those needs using the following criteria:
1. Need: (300 out of 400 points) | ||
i. Severity of Problem | 125 | |
ii. Extent of Solution | 125 | |
iii. Third Party Documentation | 50 | |
2. Benefit (100 out of 400 points) | ||
i. Low-Mod Percentage | 50 | |
ii. Poverty Percentage | 50 | |
(B) READINESS: | Up to 300 points |
Readiness of the proposed activity as demonstrated by an activity implementation plan, local government approvals, design progress, and sufficient funding to complete the project as applicable. Readiness points will be based on:
1. Experienced In-House Staff and Ready to Start | Up to 100 | |
2. Project Approval Status | Up to 100 | |
3. Funding In Place | 75 | |
4. Site Control of Land or Project | 25 | |
(C) CAPACITY: | Up to 200 points |
Capacity to implement the proposed activity, as demonstrated by performance, including timeliness of clearance of Special Conditions, reporting and cooperation in clearing audit and monitoring findings. Capacity points based on:
1. Timely Clearance of Special Conditions | 60 | |
2. In-House Organizational Capacity for General Administration and Program Oversight | 40 | |
3. Reporting Points (point deductions for missing reports) | 70 | |
4. Cooperation/Compliance in Clearing Audit or Monitoring Findings | 30 | |
(D) STATE OBJECTIVES: | Up to 100 points |
iv. Imbalance in the population served in prior years’ awards such as smaller jurisdictions compared to larger jurisdictions, general program beneficiaries compared to special needs groups such as farm workers, under-trained work force, or historically unsuccessful or inactive applicants compared to active, successful applicants.
(A) NEED and Benefit: | Up to 400 points |
The Department will assign points based on the seriousness of the locality's community development needs, and the impact the program will have on those needs using the following criteria:
1. Need: (250 out of 400 points) (Note: An Applicant may only apply for PI as an eligible activity or PIHNC as an eligible activity; an Applicant cannot apply simultaneously for both PI and PIHNC activities. The ‘Need’ scoring criteria is different for PI and PIHNC activities. The ‘Need‘ criteria for a PI activity is based solely on one factor: the seriousness of health and safety issues, for which a maximum of 250 points may be awarded. The ‘Need’ criteria for a PIHNC activity is based upon five factors which, when added together, allow a maximum of 250 points to be awarded.)
i. PI: Seriousness of Health & Safety Issue Or (for a PIHNC activity) | 250 | |
ii. PIHNC: Condition of Approval for PIHNC | 150 | |
iii. PIHNC: Renter Overpayment | 25 | |
iv. PIHNC: Vacancy Rate | 25 | |
v. PIHNC: Overcrowding | 25 | |
vi. PIHNC: Regional Housing Need Assessment (RHNA) Data | 25 | |
2. Benefit (150 out of 400 points) | ||
i. Low-Mod Percentage | 75 | |
ii. Poverty Percentage | 75 | |
(B) READINESS: | Up to 300 points |
Readiness of the proposed activity as demonstrated by an activity implementation plan, local government approvals, design progress, and sufficient funding to complete the project as applicable. Readiness points will be based on:
1. Experienced In-House Staff & Ready to Start | Up to 100 | |
2. Project Approval Status | Up to 100 | |
3. Funding In Place | 75 | |
4. Site Control of Land or Project | 25 | |
(C) CAPACITY: | Up to 200 points |
Capacity to implement the proposed activity, as demonstrated by performance, including timeliness of clearance of Special Conditions, reporting and cooperation in clearing audit and monitoring findings. Capacity points based on:
1. Timely Clearance of Special Conditions | 60 | |
2. In-House Organizational Capacity for General Administration and Program Oversight | 40 | |
3. Reporting Points (point deductions for missing reports) | 70 | |
4. Cooperation/Compliance in Clearing Audit or Monitoring Findings | 30 | |
(D) STATE OBJECTIVES: | Up to 100 points |
iv. Imbalance in the population served in prior years’ awards such as smaller jurisdictions compared to larger jurisdictions, general program beneficiaries compared to special needs groups such as farm workers, under-trained work force, or historically unsuccessful or inactive applicants compared to active, successful applicants.
(A) NEED: | Up to 400 points |
The Department will assign points based on the seriousness of the locality's community development needs, and the impact the program will have on those needs using the following criteria:
1. Need: (300 out of 400 points) | ||
i. Severity of Problem | 125 | |
ii. Extent of Solution | 125 | |
iii. Third Party Documentation | 50 | |
2. Benefit (100 out of 400 points) | ||
i. Low-Mod Percentage | 50 | |
ii. Poverty Percentage | 50 | |
(B) READINESS: | Up to 300 points |
Readiness of the proposed activity as demonstrated by an activity implementation plan, local government approvals, design progress, and sufficient funding to complete the project as applicable. Readiness points will be based on:
1. Operator Experience/Program Readiness | Up to 175 | |
2. Site Control of Facility for Service | 125 | |
(C) CAPACITY: | Up to 200 points |
Capacity to implement the proposed activity, as demonstrated by performance, including timeliness of clearance of Special Conditions, reporting and cooperation in clearing audit and monitoring findings. Capacity points based on:
1. Timely Clearance of Special Conditions | 60 | |
2. In-House Organizational Capacity for General Administration and Program Oversight | 40 | |
3. Reporting Points (point deductions for missing reports) | 70 | |
4. Cooperation/Compliance in Clearing Audit or Monitoring Findings | 30 | |
(D) STATE OBJECTIVES: | Up to 100 points |
iv. Imbalance in the population served in prior years’ awards such as smaller jurisdictions compared to larger jurisdictions, general program beneficiaries compared to special needs groups such as farm workers, under-trained work force, or historically unsuccessful or inactive applicants compared to active, successful applicants.
(A) NEED and BENEFIT: | Up to 400 points |
Need will be based on one or more of the following factors: Unemployment and poverty levels in the jurisdiction, and market analysis.
1. Need: | ||
i. Unemployment | 100 | |
ii. Market Analysis | 250 | |
2. Benefit | ||
i. Poverty Percentage | 50 | |
(B) READINESS: | Up to 300 points |
Readiness factors will include: Program description, program organization and program operator's experience and performance. Readiness points will be based on:
1. Program Description | 25 | |
2. Program Operator's Status | 75 | |
3. Program Operator Qualifications | 200 | |
(C) CAPACITY: | Up to 200 points |
Capacity to implement the proposed activity, as demonstrated by performance, including timeliness of clearance of Special Conditions, reporting and cooperation in clearing audit and monitoring findings. Capacity points based on:
1. Timely Clearance of Special Conditions | 60 | |
2. In-House Organizational Capacity for General Administration and Program Oversight | 40 | |
3. Reporting Points (point deductions for missing reports) | 70 | |
4. Cooperation/Compliance in Clearing Audit or Monitoring Findings | 30 | |
(D) STATE OBJECTIVES: | Up to 100 points |
iv. Imbalance in the population served in prior years’ awards such as smaller jurisdictions compared to larger jurisdictions, general program beneficiaries compared to special needs groups such as farm workers, under-trained work force, or historically unsuccessful or inactive applicants compared to active, successful applicants.
(7) Planning and Technical Assistance: Pursuant to Health and Safety Code 50832(b), PTA applications will be evaluated on a first in first served basis if there are sufficient PTA funds available, but will be ranked only when the PTA allocation is oversubscribed, (where oversubscribed refers to the situation when there is not enough PTA funds to satisfy all the Applicants who submitted their funding application on the same day.) In the event the PTA allocation is oversubscribed then a tie-breaker process will be utilized, where the tie-breaker process is based on jurisdiction-wide poverty levels, with the poverty levels being ranked in descending order (i.e. the Applicant that has the greatest poverty level will be ranked highest in a tie-breaker situation.)
(8) Un-scored Set-Aside: Applications for Housing Assistance, Public Facilities, Public Improvements, Public Services and Enterprise Fund activities may request funding for one unrated eligible activity, up to the maximum specified in the NOFA, which shall be funded if at least one other Housing Assistance, Public Facilities, Public Improvements, Public Service or Enterprise Fund activity proposed in that application ranks high enough to be funded. An applicant may apply for either an unscored set-aside activity or a PTA but not both.
10. “Regional Housing Needs Assessment / RHNA Data” shall mean a regional assessment that quantifies the need for existing and future housing within each jurisdiction, whereby the communities then plan for and decide how they will address this need through the process of completing the Housing Element for their respective General Plans.
Credits
Note: Authority cited: Sections 50406(h) and 50406(n), Health and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 50406 and 50407, Health and Safety Code; 42 U.S.C. 5306(d)(2); 24 CFR 570.482(a), 24 CFR 570.483(b), and 24 CFR 570.489.
History
1. Amendment filed 2-22-85; effective upon filing pursuant to Government Code Section 11346.2(d) (Register 85, No. 9).
2. Amendment of section and Note filed 7-31-96; operative 7-31-96 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(d) (Register 96, No. 31).
3. Amendment of section and Note filed 8-13-2012; operative 8-13-2012 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4 (Register 2012, No. 33).
This database is current through 6/21/24 Register 2024, No. 25.
Cal. Admin. Code tit. 25, § 7078, 25 CA ADC § 7078
End of Document |