Home Table of Contents

§ 2111. Risk Analysis.

19 CA ADC § 2111Barclays Official California Code of Regulations

Barclays California Code of Regulations
Title 19. Public Safety
Division 1. State Fire Marshal
Chapter 14. Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety
Article 7. Requirements for New or Replacement Pipeline near Environmentally and Ecologically Sensitive Areas in the Coastal Zone; Plan to Retrofit Existing Pipelines; Notification to State Fire Marshal of New Construction or Retrofit of Pipeline; Consultation with Office of Spill Prevention and Response
19 CCR § 2111
§ 2111. Risk Analysis.
(a) Where information required by this Section exists elsewhere, copies of the pre-existing information may be submitted. If the information provided is not sufficient to meet the requirements of this Article, additional information may be requested by the State Fire Marshal. Documents submitted must be in hard copy and electronic format.
(b) Operators are required to submit a risk analysis to the State Fire Marshal considering, at a minimum, the best available technology requirements in Section 2109 (Use of Best Available Technology) and the requirements of this Article.
(c) Operators must also submit an initial Implementation Plan that outlines the time frame to implement the proposed best available technologies with the risk analysis.
(d) Operators shall provide the following information in the risk analysis:
(1) Introductory Material:
(A) name of the operator and State Fire Marshal pipeline ID number, and mailing address if different. The name and State Fire Marshal pipeline ID number shall be referenced in the title or on the title page at the front of the documents;
(B) a certification statement signed under penalty of perjury by an executive within management authorized to fully implement the risk analysis, who shall review the documents for accuracy, effectiveness, and feasibility. If this executive does not have training, knowledge, and experience in the area of risk analysis, the certification statement must also be signed by a person within the operator's management structure with the requisite training, knowledge, and experience to review a risk analysis for accuracy, effectiveness, and feasibility. The certification shall state:
“I certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the information contained in this risk analysis is true and correct and that the plan is both effective and feasible.”
__________(Signature) (Spelled Signature), (title), (date).
(C) Include a list of contacts and contact information for persons within the operator's company, and any alternates, responsible for overseeing and conducting the risk analysis. If the operator contracts for this service, contact information and alternates for the contractor shall be provided.
(D) Provide the name, address, and telephone number for an agent for service of process designated to receive legal documents on behalf of the operator. If the operator contracts for this service, documentation that the agent for service of process acknowledges this capacity shall be included in the risk analysis and plan. The agent shall be located in California.
(2) Pipeline Description
(A) Each risk analysis shall describe and consider the pipeline design and operations with specific attention to environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas. This description and consideration shall include, at a minimum, the following information:
1. a piping and instrumentation diagram, and a tank diagram including the location of pumps, valves, vents and lines; the number, and oil capacity of each pipeline covered under the risk analysis and its age, design, known design defects, construction and general condition; the range of oil products normally shipped in the pipeline; the nature and characteristics of the product the pipeline is transporting; physical support of the pipeline segment, such as by a cable suspension bridge; operating conditions of the pipeline; the hydraulic gradient of the pipeline; the presence or absence of containment structures; the capacity of the pipeline; the diameter of the pipeline, material and manufacturing information and seem type, the potential release volume, and the distance between the isolation points.
2. vicinity maps showing any vehicular or rail crossings along the pipeline, nearby residential, commercial, or other populated areas;
3. seasonal hydrographic and climatic conditions;
4. physical geographic features, including type of soil and terrain; drainage systems such as small streams and other smaller waterways that could serves as a conduit to an environmentally and ecologically sensitive area; roadway crossings and ditches; potential natural forces inherent in the area; natural and manmade barriers; potential physical pathways between the pipeline and environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas; and any other physical feature or peculiarity of local geography that call for special precautionary measures that may affect environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas.
(3) A summary of the risk analysis shall be included and must describe the method used in the risk analysis, and a statement that the analysis is specific to the pipeline. All supporting documentation used to develop the risk analysis summary shall be made available to the State Fire Marshal upon request.
(4) The operator must conduct a spill analysis to determine the consequences of a potential release. The spill analysis shall assume adverse environmental conditions such that the worst possible dispersion of oil will be considered. This spill analysis is intended to be used as the baseline for which best available technologies may be used to reduce the quantity of release in the event of a release. Some of the information required in this subsection may be drawn from the appropriate Area Contingency Plans. The spill analysis must be summarized in the risk analysis and shall include at least the following:
(A) a trajectory, or series of trajectories (for multiple environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas, multiple release locations, etc.), to determine the potential direction, rate of flow and time of travel of the reasonable worst case discharge from the pipeline to environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas that could be affected. For purposes of this requirement, a trajectory or trajectories that determine the outer perimeter of a spill, based on regional physical geographic and hydrographic features shall be sufficient.
(B) To calculate the reasonable worst case discharge, operators must consider whether the release is from an on-shore pipeline or an off-shore pipeline.
1. For on-shore pipelines, the reasonable worst case discharge is the largest volume in barrels of the following:
a. The pipeline's maximum release time in hours (i.e. the time between pipeline rupture and discovery), plus the maximum shut-down response time in hours (based on historic discharge data or in the absence of such historic data, the operator's best estimate), multiplied by the maximum flow rate expressed in barrels per hour (based on the maximum daily capacity of the pipeline), plus the largest line drainage volume after shutdown of the line section(s) near environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas; or
b. The largest foreseeable discharge for the line section(s) near environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas, expressed in barrels, based on the maximum historic discharge, if one exists, adjusted for any subsequent corrective or preventive action taken; or
2. For off-shore pipelines, the reasonable worst case discharge is the largest volume in barrels of the following calculation:
a. The pipeline system leak detection time, plus the shutdown response time, multiplied by the highest measured oil flow rate over the preceding 12-month period. For new pipelines, use the predicted oil flow rate. Add to this calculation the total volume of oil that would leak from the pipeline after it is shut in. This volume should be calculated by considering the effects of hydrostatic pressure, gravity, frictional wall forces, length of pipeline segment, tie-ins with other pipelines, and other factors.
(C) The operator's approach for analyzing the spill analysis and the potential effects of a pipeline failure that could affect an environmentally and ecologically sensitive area shall consider the following elements:
1. proximity to water crossings;
2. variations in topography near the pipeline;
3. variations in distance between the pipeline and the environmentally and ecologically sensitive area;
4. adequate choice of release locations;
5. failure type or size (e.g. catastrophic failure);
6. operating conditions (e.g., flow rate, operating pressure);
7. leak detection and response time;
8. calculations of drain down following leak or rupture;
9. release rates, if air dispersion is possible in the operator's system, product's behavior, air dispersion mechanisms, and ignition must be considered;
10. pipeline system design factors (e.g., pipe diameter, distance between isolation valves, location of tanks and other facilities); and
11. existing leak detection systems, automatic shutoff systems, remote controlled sectionalized block valves, computational pipeline monitoring, and emergency flow restriction devices.
(D) Where a reasonable worst case discharge could affect a waterway, the operator shall consider:
1. waterway conditions;
2. flow characteristics;
3. water properties and water transport consequences;
4. changes in commodity properties due to interaction with the environment;
5. commodity solubility; and
6. abnormal stream conditions such as flood or storm conditions.
(E) The calculations, and such parameters as flow rates, line fill capacities and emergency shutoff times, that are used to determine a pipeline's reasonable worst case discharge shall be submitted as part of the risk analysis. The State Fire Marshal may review and test these parameters.
(5) Describe how the best available technology identified will provide the greatest degree of protection by limiting the quantity of release in the event of a spill. Operators shall consider, at a minimum, the criteria the State Fire Marshall uses when making a best available technology determination found in Section 2110 (Best Available Technology Determination).
(6) Provide for training and testing on best available technology used, based on the requirements of Section 2116 (Training Requirements) and Section 2115 (Testing Requirements and Test Failures).
(7) The risk analysis shall be reviewed periodically and updated where necessary pursuant to the requirements of Section 2117 (Risk Analysis Updates and Review). All updates shall be submitted to the State Fire Marshal consistent with the requirements of this Article.

Credits

Note: Authority cited: Sections 51010, 51013.1, 51013.5 and 51015, Government Code; and Sections 60104 and 60105, Title 49 of the United States Code. Reference: Sections 51010, 51010.5, 51013, 51013.1, 51013.5, 51015, 51015.4 and 51016, Government Code; and Sections 60104 and 60105, Title 49 of the United States Code.
History
1. New section filed 8-31-2020; operative 10-1-2020 (Register 2020, No. 36).
This database is current through 5/10/24 Register 2024, No. 19.
Cal. Admin. Code tit. 19, § 2111, 19 CA ADC § 2111
End of Document