(a) Calculating Carbon Intensities. Fuel pathway applicants and the Executive Officer will evaluate all pathways based on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions per unit of fuel energy, or carbon intensity, expressed in gCO₂e/MJ. For this analysis, the fuel pathway applicant must use CA-GREET3.0 model (including the Simplified CI Calculators derived from that model) or another model determined by the Executive Officer to be equivalent or superior to CA-GREET3.0.

(b) CA-GREET3.0. The CA-GREET3.0 model (August 13, 2018) contains emission factors for calculating greenhouse gas emissions from site-specific inputs to fuel pathways and standard values for parts of the life cycle not included in applicant-specific data submission. The model is open source and publicly available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/lcfs.htm and is incorporated herein by reference. CA-GREET3.0 includes contributions from the Oil Production Greenhouse Gas Estimator (OPGEE2.0) model (for emissions from crude extraction) and Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP-BIO) together with the Agro-Ecological Zone Emissions Factor (AEZ-EF) model for land use change (LUC).

Tier 1 Simplified CI Calculators, which incorporate emission factors and life cycle inventory data from the CA-GREET3.0 model, are used to calculate carbon intensities for Tier 1 pathways. The eight Simplified CI Calculators listed below are publicly available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/lcfs.htm and are incorporated herein by reference:

(c) OPGEE2.0. The OPGEE2.0 model is used to generate carbon intensities for crude oil used in the production of ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) and California Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygenate Blending (CARBOB).

(d) Accounting for Land Use Change. The Executive Officer calculates LUC effects for certain crop-based biofuels using the GTAP model (modified to include agricultural data and termed GTAP-BIO) and the AEZ-EF model. LUC values for six feedstock/finished biofuel combinations are provided in Table 6 below. The Executive Officer may use the same modeling framework to assess LUC values for other fuel or feedstock combinations, not currently found in Table 6, as part of processing a pathway application. Alternatively, the Executive Officer may require a fuel pathway applicant to use one of the values in Table 6, if the Executive Officer deems that value appropriate to use for a fuel or feedstock combination not currently listed in Table 6.