Rule 7. Special Appellate Court Provisions
Arizona Revised Statutes AnnotatedRules of Procedure for Special Actions
17B A.R.S. Special Actions, Rules of Proc., Rule 7
Rule 7. Special Appellate Court Provisions
(b) If a special action is brought in any appellate court, and if such an action might lawfully have been initiated in a lower court in the first instance, the petition shall also set forth the circumstances which in the opinion of the petitioner render it proper that the petition should be brought in the particular appellate court to which it is presented. If the appellate court finds such circumstances insufficient, the court will on that ground dismiss the petition.
(c) If an appellate court is in recess when the petition is filed, or it is impracticable for the court to hear the application for relief immediately, the chief justice or chief judge, or any other justice or judge designated by the chief justice or chief judge, may stay proceedings of a court or officer, subject to the limitations of Rule 65 of the Rules of Civil Procedure as to ex parte orders, until the hearing provided for in this subdivision has been held or until such time as the court may otherwise order.
(d) An appellate court in which a petition for special action is filed may, through its chief justice or chief judge, or any other justice or judge designated by the chief justice or chief judge, direct that on a certain day and hour oral argument be held on the petition. The chief justice or chief judge, or any other justice or judge so designated, may direct that the petition and any response thereto be submitted without oral argument. In the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court, the petition and all papers shall be served forthwith by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent, and the time and manner in which service shall be made may be specified by the court. Objections to such relief shall be in the form of a written response, and shall be filed and served within seven days after service of the petition upon the respondent, or such lesser time as the court shall fix by order. No reply shall be filed by the petitioner unless ordered by the court, in which event a reply may be filed within the time set by the court. At the appointed time, if any, the court will hear the parties in order to determine whether jurisdiction shall be accepted. If the court accepts jurisdiction, the court will then render its decision on the merits after submission of such additional memoranda and portions of the record as the court deems appropriate. For cause shown, the appellate court may waive or order acceleration of any or all of the foregoing procedures.
(e) Any petition for special action, response thereto or reply filed in an appellate court must comply with Rules 4, 4.1 and 4.2, ARCAP. The petition shall consist of a single document. It shall include a jurisdictional statement, a statement of the issues, a statement of the facts material to a consideration of the issues presented, and an argument containing the petitioners' contentions with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and appropriate references to the record. A copy of the decision from which the petition is being taken shall be attached to the petition. All references to the record shall be supported by an appendix of documents in the record before the trial court that are necessary for a determination of the issues raised by the petition. The response to the petition shall, if necessary, be supported by an appendix of documents in the record before the trial court that are necessary for a determination of the issues raised by the petition which are not contained in the petitioner's appendix. An appendix must comply with Rule 13.1(c), ARCAP; any appendix filed electronically must comply with Rule 13.1(d), ARCAP; and any appendix filed in paper must comply with Rule 13.1(e), ARCAP. When feasible, a petition or response and an associated appendix that are filed electronically must be attached together as one document; the page number of the first page of such an appendix must be sequential to the last page of the petition or response. An appendix filed in paper that exceeds 15 pages in length may be fastened together separately from the petition or response. Except by permission of the court, petitions and responses shall not exceed (i) 10,500 words if in proportionate typeface, or (ii) 30 pages if in monospace typeface, exclusive of the appendix and the copy of the decision from which the petition is being taken, or (iii) 36 pages if handwritten. The reply, if any, shall not exceed (i) 5,250 words if in proportionate typeface, or (ii) 15 pages if in monospaced typeface, or (iii) 18 pages if handwritten. The petition, response and any reply must otherwise comply with Rule 4(a)--(c), ARCAP or Rules 31.12 or 31.13, Ariz. R. Crim. P. The petition, response and any reply must each be accompanied by a certificate of compliance that states the petition's line spacing and states either that (i) the petition uses a proportionately spaced typeface, together with the typeface, point size, and word count, or (ii) the petition uses a monospaced typeface, together with the number of characters per inch, or (iii) the petition is handwritten, together with the number of pages. A party preparing this certificate may rely on the word count of the processing system used to prepare the petition.
(g) If in a special action relief is granted by the Supreme Court or by a Court of Appeals, the order granting relief shall take such form as the court directs, but in every such case the decision of the court shall be given in writing and the grounds of decision shall be stated. If in a special action brought in the Supreme Court or a Court of Appeals relief is denied, the decision of the Court may be made by order, and no written opinion shall be required.
Amended May 9, 1980, effective July 15, 1980; April 28, 1983, effective Sept. 1, 1983; March 27, 1985, effective June 1, 1985; Feb. 18, 1992, effective May 1, 1992. Amended June 10, 1997, effective Jan. 1, 1998; Oct. 6, 1998, effective Dec. 1, 1998; Jan. 24, 2001, effective June 1, 2001; Sept. 18, 2006, effective Jan. 1, 2007; Sept. 20, 2006, effective Jan. 1, 2007; Sept. 5, 2007, effective Jan. 1, 2008; Sept. 2, 2010, effective Jan. 1, 2011; Sept. 2, 2014, effective Jan. 1, 2015; Aug. 27, 2015, effective Jan. 1, 2016.
STATE BAR COMMITTEE NOTE
(a) This is essentially identical with Rule 1(b) of the existing Rules of the Supreme Court.
(b) Under present procedures, stays are not granted by individual justices or judges, this matter being reserved for a full court or panel, with an important qualification. It has been the practice of the Chief Justice or individual Justices of the Supreme Court to grant emergency relief if the Court is in summer recess so that no court can be quickly assembled, or if for some other reason it is impracticable for the Court as a whole to hear the application for relief. The practice of the Court of Appeals in this regard has been to the contrary. It is intended by the Rule to give to the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals the same authority as is had by the Chief Justice in respect to exceptional emergency relief. Abuse is prevented by requiring the safeguards of Rule 65 of the Rules of Civil Procedure as to ex parte orders. The provisions as to security in Rule 65 are deliberately not carried forward to the appellate special actions because in most instances, bond may be unnecessary. It is assumed that the court's inherent power will be sufficient to require such security as may be warranted by the particular circumstances.
(c) The provision authorizing the Chief Justice or Chief Judge to set the time for consideration of a petition is in accordance with present practice. Service is made by the “petitioner or his agent” rather than by a process server because this, too, has been the traditional practice. These procedures are taken from Rule 1(c) of the Rules of the Supreme Court, and the detail as to the form of the written documents in opposition is added from the existing practice.
(d) It is not the intention of the Rule to burden the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals with the responsibility of writing lengthy opinions. If, after jurisdiction is assumed, relief is denied on the merits, a minute entry to that effect shall be sufficient. If the case is of sufficient public importance, the Court may issue a written opinion even when relief on the merits is denied. The requirement of stating the grounds of decision when relief on the merits is granted does not necessarily entail a lengthy opinion. If the Court deems it appropriate, it would be sufficient to utilize the form of findings of fact and conclusions of law, as presently used in Superior Court practice.
(e) This Rule changes terminology, and we now refer to petitions for extraordinary relief as special actions. However, the change in terminology does not signal any relaxation of the standards heretofore used by the courts with regard to special writs. To make sure that there will be no frivolous use of the special action procedures, the Rule gives the discretion to the appellate court in which a special action is filed to impose the sanctions provided by A.R.S. § 12-2106.
Application [of amendment by June 10, 1997 order]
Applicable to all cases in which the petition, motion, brief, decision, paper, or transcript is filed or required to be filed on or after January 1, 1998.
17B A. R. S. Special Actions, Rules of Proc., Rule 7, AZ ST SPEC ACT Rule 7
Current with amendments received through 11/1/19
|End of Document||© 2020 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.|