Home Table of Contents

005.01.24. Appendix 2. Evaluation Rubric

AR ADC 005.01.24. Appendix 2Arkansas Administrative CodeEffective: May 19, 2018

West's Arkansas Administrative Code
Title 005. Department of Education
Division 01. Division of Fiscal & Administrative Services
Rule 24. Rules Governing Education Service Cooperatives
Effective: May 19, 2018
Ark. Admin. Code 005.01.24. Appendix 2
005.01.24. Appendix 2. Evaluation Rubric
User Satisfaction and Service Adequacy
Reference In current rules
5 Excellence
4 Exceeding Standards
3 Meeting Standards
2 Alert
1 In Need of Immediate Improvement
22.2 Annual user Satisfaction Survey Results (all personnel of member districts)
90% or greater satisfied/very satisfied
80-89% or greater satisfied/very satisfied
70-79% or greater satisfied/very satisfied
60-69% or greater satisfied/very satisfied
50-59% or greater satisfied/very satisfied
22.2 Summative PD session evaluation responses
3.8 or higher on 4.0 scale
3.4 to 3.7 on 4.0 scale
3.0 to 3.3 on 4.0 scale
2.6 to 3.2 on 4.0 scale
2.5 or below on 4.0 scale
17.00 Annual Surveys and Needs Assessments
Meets 4 of the 4 criteria
Meets 4 of 4 criteria
Meets 4 of 4 criteria listed below:
Meets 3 of 4 criteria.
Meets 2 or less of the 4 criteria.
AND
AND
5. Evidence that a Professional Development Needs Survey was administered;
Reports survey and needs assessment results to member districts and the Department
Reports survey and needs assessment results to member districts.
6. Evidence that the survey data was reviewed by cooperative leadership;
AND
7. Evidence of ongoing input of district needs from various groups (id Teacher Center Committee, job alike groups, etc.
Reports any duplications to the Department
8. Works with the Department to conduct surveys that complement, rather than duplicate the work of the Department.
4.2 Provide Assistance
Meets 3 of the 3 criteria
Meets 3 of the 3 criteria.
Meets 3 of the 3 criteria listed below:
Meets 2 of the 3 criteria.
Meets 1 of the 3 criteria.
AND
AND
4. Assist member districts in meeting or exceeding accreditation standards and equalizing educational opportunities;
Provides evidence that exceeds the expectation in at least two (2) areas such as exceeding accreditation standards and equalizing education opportunities
Provides evidence that exceeds the expectation in at least one (1) area such as exceeding accreditation standards and equalizing education opportunities OR a cost analysis study of coordinated services.
5. Using educational resources more effectively through cooperation among school districts; and
AND
6. Promoting coordination between school districts and the Department in order to provide services that are consistent with the needs identified by school districts and the education priorities of the state.
a cost analysis study of coordinated services.
9.00 Teacher Center Committee and 10.00 Other Necessary Committees
Meets 5 of the 5 criteria.
Meets 5 of the 5 criteria.
Meets 5 of the 5 criteria listed below:
Meets 4 of the 5 criteria.
Meets 3 or less of the 5 criteria.
AND
AND
6. A teacher center will provide, if funds are available, curriculum development assistance, educational materials, and staff development services to teachers within the area.
Lists the other committees and the purposes or responsiveness to member districts.
Lists the other committees and the purposes or responsiveness to member districts.
7. A teacher center committee is composed of a least one (1) representative from the staff of each school district;
AND
8. At least one-half (1/2), but not more than two-thirds (2/3) of the members are classroom teachers;
Best practices are shared publicly.
9. The committee meets at least three (3) times per year; and
10. Other committees of local school personnel are convened to be responsive to the member districts.
16.00 Liaison with Postsecondary Institutions
Collaborates with more than two (2) postsecondary institutions on a regular basis.
Collaborates with more than one (1) postsecondary institution on a regular basis.
Shall cooperate with the state-supported postsecondary institution located within its area.
Cooperates with one (1) postsecondary institution within the state.
Does not cooperate or collaborate with a postsecondary institution.
AND
Best practices are shared publically.
Staff Qualification and Administrative Effectiveness
Reference In current rules
5 Excellence
4 Exceeding Standards
3 Meeting Standards
2 Alert
1 In Need of Immediate Improvement
11.00 Director
Meets 5 of the 5 criteria
Meets 5 of the 5 criteria
Meets 5 of the 5 criteria listed below:
Meets 4 of the 5 criteria.
Meets 3 or less of the 5 criteria.
12.00 Personnel
AND
AND
6. All positions requiring licensure are occupied by personnel possessing licensure or approved alternative
14.00 General policies, rules and regulations
All audit findings are addressed
All audit findings are addressed
7. Evidence of staff formal evaluations including performance evaluation of director
21.00 Policies, procedures, expenditures, reports and audits
AND
8. Personnel policies are in place and current
Best practices are shared publicly
9. Annual reports are compiled and disseminated to individuals and entities required by statute
10. There is no evidence of fiscal distress as witnessed by any one of criteria in 27.00 of the Rules
3.00 Board of Directors
The Board of Directors meet more than eight (8) times each year, and written policies and procedures for operation are filed with the State Board.
The Board of Directors meet more than eight (8) times each year, and written policies and procedures for operation are filed with the State Board.
The Board of Directors meet at least eight (8) times each year, and general fiduciary responsibilities for the cooperative are documented.
The Board of Directors meet less than eight (8) times each year, and/or general fiduciary responsibilities for the cooperative are minimally documented.
The Board of Directors meet less than eight (8) times each year, and/or general fiduciary responsibilities for the cooperative are not adequately documented.
8.00 Executive Committee
AND
May substitute: The executive committee or board of directors meets more than required.
OR
Records of internal improvement in efficiency of operation are available upon request.
The executive committee meets at least nine (9) times per year, and the board of directors meets at least three (3) times annually. The president of the board shall serve as chair of the executive committee.
May substitute: The executive committee and board of directors meet more than required.
Extent of Local Financial Support
Reference In current rules
5 Excellence
4 Exceeding Standards
3 Meeting Standards
2 Alert
1 In Need of Immediate Improvement
18.00 Programs and Services
Meets 3 of the 3 criteria.
Meets 3 of the 3 criteria.
Meets 3 of the 3 criteria listed below:
Meets 2 of the 3 criteria.
Meets 1 or less of the 3 criteria.
19.00 Participation of Local School Districts
AND
AND
1. Programs and services are based on the needs of the member districts and priorities of the state;
22.2 extent of local financial support
Programs and services are documented based on needs assessment and evaluation is reported.
Programs and services are documented based on needs assessment.
2. Each member district is entitled to participate in programs and services that are fully supported by state funds
24.00 Technology Centers
AND
AND
3. Programs and other services may be supported by local funds.
25.00 Mathematics and Science Center
Resources of the educational service cooperative are enhanced by forming support networks among the member schools to provide extended services, provide new services and combine funding to support programs such as group purchasing, thus maximizing local school district funding. 90% or more of member districts participate by purchasing services and providing release time for staff to engage in specialized training & services.
50% or more of member districts support the cooperative in offering extended services in two (2) or more activities or events or purchased services with local funds.
AND
AND
Cost analysis study has been performed for 1/5 of member districts annually and the findings have been shared in a face-to-face meeting with the superintendent.
At least one (1) cost analysis study has been performed and the findings have been shared in a face-to-face meeting with the superintendent(s)
AND
Best practices are shared publicly.
TOTAL EDUCATION SERVICE COOPERATIVE EVALUATION
Cooperative Evaluation Level
Level 5 -- Excellence
Level 4 -- Exceeding Standards
Level 3 -- Meeting Standards
Level 2 -- Alert
Level 1 -- In Need of Immediate Improvement
Level 5 -- A cooperative must receive a majority score of 5 on categories (at least 6 out 9 categories); and no scores below 3.
Level 4 -- A cooperative must receive at least six (6) scores of 4 or some combination of 4 or 5; and no scores below 3.
Level 3 -- A cooperative must receive at least six (6) scores of 3 or some combination of 3, 4, or 5; may include only one score of a 2 (if some combination of 4 or 5 was assigned) with no additional scores below a 3.
Level 2 -- A cooperative scores 2 in 2 or more categories.
Level 1 -- A cooperative scores 1 in 1 or more categories.

Credits

Adopted June 26, 2017. Amended May 19, 2018.
Current with amendments received through February 15, 2024. Some sections may be more current, see credit for details.
Ark. Admin. Code 005.01.24. Appendix 2, AR ADC 005.01.24. Appendix 2
End of Document